Quantcast
Channel: Nintex Connect: Active Threads
Viewing all 4245 articles
Browse latest View live

Problem with assign FlexiTask

$
0
0

Hi all,

we have a workflow with the assign Flexi-Task action from Nintex 2010.
In 99% the workflow is working as expected... But sometimes the Workflow crashes during the assign Flexi-Task action.

We really don´t know why, because everything seems to be correct (variables and so on)... We enabled the verbose logging for this Workflow but also with that information we have no chance to get deeper into this problem...

Problem:
The task is shown as assigned to the correct person but the status is: completed and the outcome is: Not required
If you terminate this workflow and restart the workflow on the same item without any changes then it is working...

Any ideas what could be wrong here?


How to figure out on witch Items runs old instances ?

$
0
0
I have tested a lot and now I can see under "Workflow settings" that I have some old Workflows instances running. How can I figure out on witch items these instances are running. I don't want to look in each of 2000 item.

You have not been allowed as a workflow designer on this teamsite. Contact your Administrator for access.

$
0
0

Hi,

We are facing this issue on Nintex workflow 2010 once it was activated in one of our site collections(This site collection is a migrated one). We are not able to publish workflows as it showed the below error saying that we dont have the permission

Error :You have not been allowed as a workflow designer on this teamsite. Contact your Administrator for access.

When I tried to access the "Allowed workflow Designers" its giving me access denied error even though I am having Site Collection Admin and Site Owner access in the site. Even our networks team is also getting access denied error using their farm account. Expecting your valid suggestions.

Thanks,

Nintex Workflow options are not available on my site

$
0
0

Recently installed a trail version of the Nintex tool on my dev server. Followed as per the instructions document and activiated the features across all site collections.

I'm able to see the Nintex option on Central Administration-->Site Actions-->  but not able to see the options when I go to my site and created a brand new list and want to create a new Nintex workflow but not available under Workflows. I'm using SharePoint 2010 environment.

What are the steps I need to take to get this showing under my site.

 

Thanks 

 

 

"Date and time" variable behavior - addition of time zone difference

$
0
0

Can you please explain me "Date and time" variable behavior? It's casing me problems in many workflows. The main problem seems to be when I need to pass the value between two workflows using "Start workflow" action.

 

MOSS 2007 version: 12.0.0.6656, English version with Czech language pack
Nintex 2007 version: 11100
Time zone: GMT+1 (GMT+2 during daylight saving time)

 

Here are some scenarios to illustrate what happens to the time value when I call second workflow and pass the value as a "Start data". I print the result using "Log in the history list" action.

 

Scenario 1)

WF1 output:"Date and time" type, value: 1.1.2012 10:00
WF2 Start data: "Date and time" type, result: 1.1.2012 11:00 (1hr difference)

 

WF1 output:"Date and time" type, value: 17.4.2012 10:00 (date from daylight saving time interval)
WF2 Start data: "Date and time" type, result: 17.4.2012 12:00 (2hr difference)

 

Scenario 2)

WF1 output:"Date and time" type, value: 1.1.2012 10:00
WF2 Start data: "Text" type, value: 2012-01-01T10:00:00Z
WF2 Value converted to "Date and time" type using "Convert value" action (empty "Date format" paramter), result: 1.1.2012 11:00 (1hr difference)

 

WF1 output:"Date and time" type, value: 17.4.2012 10:00
WF2 Start data: "Text" type, value: 2012-04-17T10:00:00Z
WF2"Text" type converted to "Date and time" type using"Convert value" action (empty "Date format" parameter), result: 17.4.2012 12:00 (2hr difference)

 

Scenario 3)

WF1"Date and time" type converted to "Text" type using"Bild Dynamic String" action
WF1 output:"Text" type, value: 1.1.2012 10:00
WF2 Start data: "Date and time" type, result: 1.1.2012 11:00 (1hr difference, again 2hr difference if the date is from daylight saving time interval)

 

Scenario 4)

WF1"Date and time" type converted to "Text" type using"Bild Dynamic String" action
WF1 output:"Text" type, value: 1.1.2012 10:00
WF2 Start data: "Text" type, value: 1.1.2012 10:00
WF2"Text" type converted to "Date and time" type using"Convert value" action (empty "Date format" parameter), result: 1.1.2012 10:00 (CORRECT)


Never makes any difference if I try to set values to Local or UTC time using"Calculate date" action. Tried on both sides - WF1 output value and WF2 input value.

 

Is the scenario 4 the only way how to correctly pass values between workflows? Or am I just doing something wrong?

Why do UDA variables interfere when called from for-each loop? Is it a bug?

$
0
0

A have a UDA that accepts one parameter X and uses one variable Y internally. It does 3 activities only:

  1. Logs content of a variable Y to workflow log (should be always blank)
  2. Assigns parameter X to variable Y
  3. Repeats Step 1 (logs variable Y that now should have the same content as variable X)

 To our horror we observed that:

  1. If we have the UDA placed twice in a workflow all works as expected (Step 1 logs an empty content in both runs)
  2. If we have the same UDA called twice from a foreach loop in a workflow it works differently (Step 1 logs an empty content in the first run BUT then it logs content from the first one in the second run). The data is basically not cleared and we have data from outside the scope of the current UDA run.

Has this been identified as a bug? Is there a plan to resolve it?

Thanks and Regards,

Geza

Error processing XML - (404) Not found

$
0
0

Hello,

I wrote a workflow that creates a new document set when a new item in a list has been created. This workflow works as designed. Recently I updated the document set library to automatically create an InfoPath form when the document set is created, independently of the workflow. I am trying to revise my existing workflow to use the Update XML action that will update a field in the form based on information already being used to name the document set. But I keep getting the message "Error processing XML - (404) Not found."

I assumed there might be an issue with trying to update the form before it had been created. I tried using a Commit pending changes action and also a Pause for... action before the Update XML action but neither solved the problem. My URL path is written correctly, and I tested this out by pointing to another copy of the form that was created manually in another document set. Still I receive this error message.

So what exactly does "Not found" mean?

Thanks,

Rob 

Getting ListID for newly created list

$
0
0

I've gone through existing posts on here and nothing is helping me so far, so I'm hoping you all can give me a hand.

I'm building a workflow that will run on a document set and create an Issues List using part of the document set title in the name. I want to then update a hyperlink column on my document set with a link to the issues list that was created. So far my workflow is doing the following:

1. Create the Issue List (title of list is - Review List: {ItemProprety:Title}) -- my list is being created successfully so no issue here. I tried updating the current item and setting the hyperlink but the URL of the issues list is getting cut off, so I can't do it this way, I have to get the ListID.

2. Using a Call Web Service using Lists.asmx and the GetList method and storing the result in a single line variable called "xmlresult". I wanted to see what the XML was returning so I emailed myself with xmlresult in the body of the email and I don't see XML...I see something like the following:

0;#Approved1;#Rejected2;#Pending3;#Draft4;#Scheduled0

Edit

1

1

New

Selected

Normal

" id="

" Url="

" DRef="

" Perm="

4. I created a Query XML action using my xmlresult as the source and if I return //@ID I get a list of all guids in my site. 

 

I'm just wondering what I'm doing wrong here.  I looked through another forum post at http://connect.nintex.com/forums/thread/17761.aspx but this didn't help me.

Can anyone point me in a direction of what I might be doing wrong?

Thank you in advance!

Chris 

 

     


    Nintex 2013 preview is stuck at Connecting to SharePoint

    $
    0
    0

    Hi,

    After configuring SharePoint 2013 workflows, nintex 2013 preview is stuck at "Connecting to SharePoint".


    How to create Project Event WF for Baseline?

    $
    0
    0
    Actually, I'm interested in, how to develop project event wf for checking if project has baselined?

    Getting error while calling the web services

    $
    0
    0

    Hi Team,

    i am receiving an error like "failed to invoke web services. error returned from server:<!DocTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3c//DTD HTML 4.01//EN""http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">

    <HTML><HEAD><TITLE>service unavailable</TITLE>

    <META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" Content="text/html;Charse

    can you please let me know what was the reason for this ASAP?

    Thanks,

    Bhavya.

    Initiator's Display Name

    $
    0
    0

    Hi all,

     

    Using Nintex 2010 workflows for PWA2010 project types, I’d like to capture the person who clicks SUBMIT to progress through our workflows.

     

    Using the “Set Project Stage” action I added the predefined variable “Initiator’s Display Name” as the Message to log on completion (Common tab).  Unfortunately this returns “System Account” at every pass when viewed in PWA via the Additional Workflow Data link.  

     

    How do I return the actual name of the person who clicked Submit? 

     

    Thanks in advance….

    Force Workflow Field Value to PWA Custom Field

    $
    0
    0

    Hi all,

    This should be really simple…

    I’m using Nintext 2010 + PWA 2010 for workflow driven enterprise project types.

    Here’s my situation: I'm trying to set a custom field in PWA to be one of two values based on a key word in the Enterprise Project Type Names. For example, we have four Enterprise Project Types, some having 'Project' in the name and others having 'Work Order' in the name. I want to simply return Project or Work Order as a general bucket for filtering purposes.

    I’m sure there’s several ways to do this, but so far I’ve failed from the custom field side where I was attempting to read the workflow phase and generate a simple IF formula from that. Now I’m hoping the workflow can simply push the value to a PWA custom field but so far I've not been successful. For example, each workflow would have a variable set to either "Project" or "Work Order" and that would be pushed to the PWA custom field.

    So my question: What action do I use in Nintext to write this key word to a custom field in PWA?  Is there a way to do it "cleanly" so that a project check-in is not required for the field to write?

    I'm also open to other suggestions on how to do this; again it should be really simple. I’ve posted on Technet but not much of a response.

    Thanks in advance... 

    An error has occurred in Capabilities Testing

    $
    0
    0

    Nintex 2013 on  SharePoint 2013

    I have a flow that has multiple parallel paths and a "Set a Condition" decision where there is nothing on the "No" path and when testing the flow the following error is thrown when the flow follows the "No" path:

    Error in approval header. Cannot insert the value NULL into column 'WorkflowProgressID', table 'NW2013DB.dbo.HumanWorkflow'; column does not allow nulls. INSERT fails.
    The statement has been terminated.
    The 'CreateHumanWorkflowInstance' procedure attemp

    If we add a "Assign to-do task" to the "No" path the flow succeeds when the flow follows the "No" path, but we do not want anything to be done on the "No" path.

    Downgrade Edition / Query if Enterprise Features are Used

    $
    0
    0

    Hello,

    Ist there any possibility to query if any WF 2010 Enterprise Feature ist really in use in the Farm?

    Is there a save way to downgrade from Enterprise to Standard edition?

    Thanks
    Tom


    "Store Reslults in" not showing in Query List-Action

    $
    0
    0

    Hi,

    I'm building an approval workflow that will show an overview of all comments to the initiator. The problem is: when I insert the "Query List"-action the option "Store results in" is not shown. Is this a known issue in Nintex WF2010? Because, without this option you simply cannot use the action.

    Workflow stuck in state machine, but not sure where

    $
    0
    0

    We currently have a running workflow that seems to be stuck in a state machine. This workflow goes through a list on concurrers and assigns tasks to them one at a time. This particular document has 10 concurrers, but after the 2nd person approved their task the workflow stopped doing anything. Below is a copy of the workflow history. I replaced the users names with their role in the workflow. When we view the graphical detail, we are unable to see exactly where it's stuck since we hid the dirty work from the users view. I tried adding attachments of the graphical view and our complete workflow, but the site says I don't have permissions to do that. On a side note, I've noticed that we've been having more issues since we upgraded our Nintex; we are now on Nintex 2007(11200). We're hoping maybe there is a way to get more insight on where the workflow is having issues and ideally we would not like to restart the workflow since it's been in the works for 2 months. I also took a look at the logs and could not find anything regarding this task. Thank you for your time and any help you can provide.

     

    Action History

    ActionStartEndDuration
    Request Concurrence7/20/2011 7:55 AM8/22/2011 10:22 PM33 days 14 hours 27 minutes
    Request Concurrence7/11/2011 1:10 PM7/20/2011 7:48 AM8 days 18 hours 38 minutes
    Get Concurrance7/11/2011 1:07 PMincomplete
    Get Concurrance7/11/2011 1:07 PMincomplete
    Request approval6/17/2011 9:48 AM7/11/2011 1:07 PM24 days 3 hours 18 minutes
    Document Owner Review6/17/2011 9:44 AMincomplete

    Task History

    Task: Request Concurrence. Started at: 7/20/2011 7:55 AM, ended at: 8/22/2011 10:22 PM
    UserAssigned TimeCompleted TimeOutcomeComments
           Concurrer27/20/2011 7:55 AM8/22/2011 10:22 PMConcur(LORD\Concurrer2)
           Concurrer17/11/2011 1:10 PM7/20/2011 7:48 AMConcur(LORD\Concurrer1)
    Task: Request approval. Started at: 6/17/2011 9:48 AM, ended at: 7/11/2011 1:07 PM
    UserAssigned TimeCompleted TimeOutcomeComments
           Approver6/17/2011 9:48 AM7/11/2011 1:07 PMApproved(LORD\Approver)
    Task: Document Owner Review. Started at: 6/17/2011 9:44 AM, ended at: 6/17/2011 9:48 AM
    UserAssigned TimeCompleted TimeOutcomeComments
           Initiator6/17/2011 9:44 AM6/17/2011 9:48 AMStart Approval Process(LORD\Initiator) Second Attempt!!

    Workflow Messages

    TimeEventMessageOutcome
    6/17/2011 9:48 AMTask Completed(LORD\Initiator) Second Attempt!!Start Approval Process
    7/11/2011 1:07 PMTask Completed(LORD\Approver) Approved
    7/20/2011 7:48 AMTask Completed(LORD\Concurrer1) Concur
    8/22/2011 10:22 PMTask Completed(LORD\Concurrer2) Concur

    Previous versions of reusable workflow templates appear to be executed by workflow.asmx

    $
    0
    0

    I'm using the Nintexworkflow/workflow.asmx web service to start a workflow using the fileUrl and workflowName. This secondary workflow is using a site collection reusable workflow template, attached to the library using the OOTB workflow settings.

    This process works well and is used to execute a reusable publishing workflow (across farms) on documents that the initial workflow deems publishable.

    The issue I am having is that if I update/republish the reusable workflow template, although the workflows are updated on the libraries that are subscribed to them the previous version of the workflow seems to be executed by the initial workflow.

    If I remove the previous versions of the reusable workflow in the libraries workflow version history and restart the initial workflow things work as expected but I means that the advantages of maintaining these workflows with a reusable template is lost as I need to go through each library and clean them up each time.

    I would have assumed that previous versions of the workflow wouldn't be used, even if they share the same workflow name and certainly wouldn't be able to be executed if they are set to 'no new instances', but that seems to be happening.

    How do I control tab sequence on a form?

    $
    0
    0

    I have several controls on a form and when it first opens, the second control has the focus.

    How can I reorder the tab stops to control this?

    Thanks.

    RBZステージ2フェアウェイウッドとハイブリッド

    $
    0
    0

    RBZステージ2フェアウェイウッドとハイブリッド
    RocketBallzのフェアウェイウッドのテーラーメイドのオリジナルラインは二つの理由ゴルファー忍び笑いをしました:
    自分の名前
    距離ゴルファーは彼らの古いフェアウェイウッドに比べてそれらをヒットすることができました
    距離の向上がより前方、低いCGとテーラーメイドのスピードポケット、mishitsに顔柔軟性と赦しを増加させることを唯一のスロットの組み合わせだった改善されたボールの速度の製品だった。rbz ドライバーのフェアウェイウッドは革命的であったが、彼らは完璧ではなかった - 多くのゴルファーは、ヘッドが少なすぎるスピンショットで、その結果、あまりにも深かったことを不平を言った。テーラーメイド rbz ドライバーオフ偉大だったとしながら、その大きなフットプリントは光ラフのフェアウェイと外をオフ使用するようにそれらが厳しいた。

    テーラーメイドは、今年のRBZステージ2フェアウェイウッドが事前RBZ日からなんと27ヤード増加に計算し、昨年の巨大企業よりも10ヤードより長いものだと言っている。彼らは理由テーラーメイドが "RocketSteel。"新しい材料がテーラーメイドR11sドライバージ2フェアウェイウッドとハイブリッドのツアーと標準モデルに使用されている呼び出して新しい面材とペアださらに低く、より前方にCGの昨年のモデルよりも長くしている、元のモデルで使用される455カーペンタースチールよりも38パーセントも強力です。それは、フェアウェイウッドの顔が特定の地域では1.8ミリメートル、0.25ミリメートルの改善限り薄くすることができます。

    追加された距離よりも多分もっと重要な我々のテストでは、はるかに汎用性を許可された浅いプロファイルを持っているRBZステージ2フェアウェイの森、の改良形です。R11sドライバー低い紡糸ツアーモデルフェアウェイウッドとハイブリッドも同じくらい1.5度まで上下に簡単にフィットすると別のコース条件にゴルファーの曲に自分のクラブを助ける0.5度刻みでロフトを調整ホーゼルが付属しています。スペックやシャフトの情報は次の場所から入手できます。

    Viewing all 4245 articles
    Browse latest View live